• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails


  • Subject: Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails
  • From: "Andrew R. Kinnie" <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:22:23 -0400


I do think WO's "getting started" story really sucks right now, and I hope we can make that better. Getting up-and-running with Rails is very easy ... The equivalent process in WO is pretty annoying. But things like Jeremy's WOlips installer will hopefully make that much better, and I think we're continually moving the tools side forward towards greater ease-of-use.

I agree with this, I think WO would be a heck of a lot better sell if other developers could just jump in easily and try it out. Right now, there are enough hoops to jump through, and the perception of it dying on the vine are enough to push many people away from even seriously thinking about it, much less applying the time needed to get their head around what's needed to get up and running.


This is why I asked the original question. I think it would be really cool if the guys in this groups (and any of the many other such groups) were made aware and shown the possibilities.

The WOLips/Wonder people are doing amazing work. The more talented people that know, the better, from my perspective.

Andrew
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Prev by Date: Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails
  • Next by Date: Re: inline binding problem (SOLVED) - but broken again by refactor > format!!
  • Previous by thread: Re: WO vs. Ruby on Rails
  • Next by thread: Re: WO vs Ruby on Rails
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread