Re: source control best practice with wonder
Re: source control best practice with wonder
- Subject: Re: source control best practice with wonder
- From: Simon McLean <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:04:15 +0000
What does everyone else do with the woproject files when it comes to source control ?
For years, I just swore at them.
I've done a bit of that too!
The best practice is probably to migrate your project structure to the Fluffy Bunny Layout (I really should make a Wiki page for that) and have your source control ignore woproject/.
Am i right in thinking that the FBL completely ignores the pattern-set stuff and instead relies on the physical folder structure of the project ? If so, then that a page on it would be superb.
I think so. Fuzzy Bunny is the work of Anjo (hence the name ;-).
I'm intrigued... I am using a slightly perverted form of it, due mostly to my own peculiar tastes, so I am not 100% sure.
Does anyone actually like the pattern set stuff ? I'm not being rude about it, just wondering if it's one of those things that everyone tolerates because "that's the way it is". I'd put it quite high on the list of "confusing-things-to-get-your-head-around-when-moving-to-eclipse". It just doesn't feel intuitive. Whereas putting your components in the "components" directory, and your resources in the "resources" directory is more my cup of tea.
Just a thought.
Simon |
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden