• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings


  • Subject: Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings
  • From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:01:54 -0600

On 27.03.2008, at 15:47, Mike Schrag wrote:

My bullet points on the subject :)


* [xxx] guarantees you an extra character to type on every binding -- completion can never fill it in for you because it never knows when you're done
* even Apple doesn't use [xxx] syntax for cocoa bindings OR ObjC 2.0 properties (which were designed to look like bindings), though admittedly they don't use $ either, but they EXPLICITLY did not use [xxx] markup
* $xxx is the standard inline markup of just about every template language, which, for one, also makes it consistent with the velocity templates that we use other places inside of WOLips

And you can set the WebObjects 5.4 inline bindings to use the $ style too. So this is currently the one working on both systems.


cug

--
http://www.event-s.net

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings
      • From: Archibald Singleton <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings (From: Archibald Singleton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings (From: Archibald Singleton <email@hidden>)
 >Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings
  • Next by Date: Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings
  • Previous by thread: Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings
  • Next by thread: Re: [Wonder-disc] Is there an equivalent for the ?key="value" syntax but for ognl inline bindings
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread