• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https


  • Subject: Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https
  • From: Serge Cohen <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:05:42 +0100

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Mike;

I've ust done that (adding the code you mention to Application.didFinishLaunching), and now the problem is not there anymore. So indeed it seems that the faulty code is sitting in ERXWOForm ...

Then I had a look in the Wonder's code for ERXWOForm, and looking at the different places where 'secure' or '_secure' are used I have the impression that if the binding is not set than (_secure==null) then secure is set to false ... rather than context.isSecure()

Would it help for a quick fix if I provide a reduced application demonstrating the bug ?

Cheers;

Serge.

Le 28 mars 08 à 19:57, Mike Schrag a écrit :
oh good god no ... you can probably

		ERXPatcher.setClassForName(WOForm.class, "WOForm");

in your didFinishLaunching ...

On Mar 28, 2008, at 2:27 PM, Serge Cohen wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

How would I do that... is the only possibility is to remove all call to Wonder in my code, and then re-build removing the Wonder's Framework from the classpath?
Given the number of places where I'm currently using Wonder's replacement, it would be much easier if I can only make sure that the WOForm are indeed the WebObjects ones. I though of using full class names, but tere is a bug in 5.4 that prevent dotted names in the wod file ...


Obvioulsy if there is no other way, I'll go the 'hard' way, removing all references to Wonder in my code and rebuilding ...

Thanks for the hint!

Serge.

PS : Indeed looking at the doc. from WOContext I had also find the context.doesGenerateCompleteURLs() method and I already checked that indeed it was ALWAYS returning 'NO' (under both http/https and switching from one to the other) conditions.


Le 28 mars 08 à 18:50, Mike Schrag a écrit :
Wonder does have a replacement WOForm (ERXWOForm), so it's possible there's some issue there ... You could try taking out Wonder's temporarily to see if the problem persists. If it does, let me know as I'm fixing some Wonder/5.4 compatibility issues at the moment.

ms

On Mar 28, 2008, at 1:44 PM, Mr. Pierre Frisch wrote:
I just checked and WOForm should use the result of context.secureMode() to determine if it needs to generate secure URLs. It is also possible to force the behavior by adding a binding "secure=true;" and the same logic should apply It is in fact the same code that is called.

The exact behavior is to honor the result context.doesGenerateCompleteURLs() except if there is a change of transport mode between the request and the current setting of the context. To me more precise if the request was insecure but the context is secure (context.secureMode()) then WO will generate complete URLs. The same is true in the other direction.

Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
email@hidden


On Mar 28, 2008, at 6:11, Serge Cohen wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello Pierre;

Thanks for the quick answer. Indeed these methods do not seem to be in the javadoc for WebObjects 5.4.1

Using it I've made a quick-check and realised that indeed the WOContext does realise properly if it is Secure or not. In other words, if I log the result of aContext.isSecure (be it before or after the super.appendToResponse call) it's properly set : It's set to NO before the redirect, and YES after.

Then I realised that indeed this URL trouble is only present in URLS that are a form's actions. The 'normal' hyperlinks (the one generated by WOHyperlink or WOResourceURL) are properly generated (that is, they are never including scheme and hotsname). Is it that the form need also to be 'informed' that it should specifically ask for secure transport (could not find any such indication in the documentation)?

Thanks again for the initial answer, and I hope you'll be able to help me now that I've made the question more precise.

Serge.


Le 27 mars 08 à 11:54, Mr. Pierre Frisch a écrit :
With WO 5.4.x WOContext has gained a few method to correctly manage the secure transport.

	/**
	 * Return true if the context is in secure mode.
	 *
	 * @return true if in secure mode
	 * @since 5.4
	 */
	public boolean secureMode()

	/**
	 * Puts the context in secure mode.
	 *
	 * @param value
	 */
	public void setSecureMode(boolean value)

WOContext should also correctly manage the complete URLs. If the secure mode is turned on and the request was not made on secure transport then the URL will be complete.

Cheers

Pierre
--
Pierre Frisch
email@hidden


On Mar 27, 2008, at 2:26, Serge Cohen wrote:
Oups ... just realised that I send this mail to the "wrong" (not totally) mailing list ... It's most likelly not a Wonder issue but rather a WebObjects 5.4 one...

Someone has the same experience than I when using redirection to change from http to https ?
Here is the message I've sent yesterday to the Project Wonder list ...


In the application I'm currently working on, I sometimes have to turn to HTTPS (decision made at runtime) using the following code in Session.appendToResponse :

public void appendToResponse(WOResponse aResponse, WOContext aContext) {
// Shall we ask for HTTPS or HTTP (or leave the transport as it is).
boolean tmpRequestIsSecure = RequestAdditions.isSecure(aContext.request());
super.appendToResponse(aResponse, aContext);
if ((requireSecure && !tmpRequestIsSecure) || (requireNotSecure && tmpRequestIsSecure)) {
// We have to redirect towards the same page, but different schema
String schema = (requireSecure) ? "https" : "http";
String redirectToURL = schema + "://" + RequestAdditions.hostName(aContext.request()) + aContext.componentActionURL();


aResponse.setStatus(302);
aResponse.setHeader(redirectToURL, "Location");
NSLog.debug.appendln("Switching schema to : " + schema + ". Redirecting to the URL '" + redirectToURL + "'.");
}
}


Till now I was developing using WebObjects 5.3.? (+ Wonder), and this was all working nicely. In particular, whatever this redirect would do the URL generated by WebObjects in the html sources would be absolute but would NOT contain the schema and host name (in other words they'd start like '/cgi-bin/ WebObjects/Incident.woa/....')

I have just upgraded to Leopard, and hence WebObjects 5.4.1 (+ Wonder).
Now the redirect still works (when enforcing 'https' usage), but upon such a redirection all the URL generated in the page are now 'complete' URL, that is they contain the schema, the hostname and then the rest (eg. 'http://foo.local/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Incident.woa/....') . In particular, when turning to 'https' all the generated URLs are now EXPLICITLY NON secured http ('http'). Still if there is no-redirection the generated URLs are the same as before (like the one generated by WO 5.3, non-complete URL, eg. '/cgi-bin/WebObjects/Incident.woa/....').


I have tried to check the value of aContext.doesGenerateCompleteURLs() (which in all cases is FALSE, which to me means that all generated URL should be absolute path without schema and hostname).

I realise that the former https bug of WebObjects 5.3 is now fixed and it might be normal that my code is not working anymore, but I could not find how I should change my code to conform to the new WO version?

Any help or hint is very welcome !



Serge.


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkfs7owACgkQlz6UVQtc2uxJIgCgrtzEdZdor+DIXIY15Ve/Fo8w
DcUAn1e8KcB5EStS9QKdikYbCM3pp2bV
=7LPo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkftOHQACgkQlz6UVQtc2uwaVwCgufHNuqXRKqOPAYaStD4nADYu
dNgAn0eQD1IXFhvaDPogt9jJWdrQalzi
=LIaz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iEYEARECAAYFAkfuBmYACgkQlz6UVQtc2uzF1ACgok1zVTg4cbEMuNKwPucYRGvk
oE4AnRoJ1xywNosAWiCM7Cfx5wLEc1p8
=BNUx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https
      • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Fwd: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https (From: Serge Cohen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https (From: Serge Cohen <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https (From: "Mr. Pierre Frisch" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Eomodeler: view choices
  • Next by Date: Re: Eomodeler: view choices
  • Previous by thread: Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https
  • Next by thread: Re: WebObjects 5.4(.1) and https
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread