Re: Versioning ... CVS or Subversion?
Re: Versioning ... CVS or Subversion?
- Subject: Re: Versioning ... CVS or Subversion?
- From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 18:43:37 +0100
Hi!
Yes, do DO need a version control system. Zipping and flash drives
are an excellent way to burn yourself with mistakes and lossing work.
There are some more version control systems, namely GIT. I still
didn't look at it. It's the system used to manage the Linux kernel
source code, and people say it basically can do anything (which might
be good or bad). Specially, merging several code forks seems to be
easier than CVS and SVN.
Anyway, between SVN and CVS, you want SVN, period! Let's say that,
the first time I used a version control system (and that was CVS) I
only committed stuff with other people looking over my shoulder to
make sure I was not going to screw things up. CVS just doesn't make
any sense, at least for me, there are too many things that are not
done the way they should.
On the contrary, SVN is what CVS should have been. It's clean, it
works. The main difference is that SVN considers a "version" to be the
state of all the files tree. IE, you know that version 234 of your
code repository means ALL the tree is in the version 234, it's like a
"snapshot" in time. CVS uses a different and independent version
number per file, which makes things chaotic. You may have a file in
version 25 (because you changed it 25 times) and another file in
version 3 (you changed it 3 times) that were actually added to the rep
at the same time. It just doesn't make any sense, again, at least for
me. Also, SVN has a very good open source book that documents
everything.
About IDE integration and software, I don't use the eclipse
plugins, because I'm lucky enough to be a alfa-beta-whatever-user of a
new GUI for SVN that is coming on for Mac OS X really soon now, and
that I simply love. But I can't talk about that right now or I'll be
killed.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
On 2008/05/11, at 14:33, Gennady Kushnir wrote:
Hello list.
I'm thinking about using some versioning system.
Trying to decide whether I do need one and if yes - which one.
I've heard something about CVS and Subversion. Maybe there is some
other...
What are advantages and disadvantages of versioning in general and of
concrete solutions.
I work on Eclipse, I've seen it does support some versioning.
Today I just zip my workspace and put it on my flashdrive. As I work
both at home and at work I have to synchronise my work.
In most cases when i come home I just trash my obsolette workspace and
unzip the one I brought from work.
But this approach has disadvantages...
first - the whole workspace (even zipped) consumes rather much disk
space (a lot more than just source codes) so my version repository
bosomes very large - when I used xCode it was much more compact as I
excluded build folder.
and second - if I forget to zip workspace and put it to my flashdrive
- than if do something after that - I have to thoroughly merge my work
after that.
Will versioning sistem help with these problems?
Another point is that today I work alone. But maybe in future I will
find some collaborator. As i understand - vesioning should help in
group work.
Interested in your opinions
Gennady Kushnir
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden