Re: Latest wonder ajax resources causes severe slowdown under tomcat REPOST from Wonder list
Re: Latest wonder ajax resources causes severe slowdown under tomcat REPOST from Wonder list
- Subject: Re: Latest wonder ajax resources causes severe slowdown under tomcat REPOST from Wonder list
- From: William Hatch <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 20:47:21 -0400
On Oct 1, 2008, at 8:22 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
IIRC, _wr_ is valid, it is a Wonderism. This is only for
Development mode which you seem to have enabled.
Uhh, so how do we explicitly disable development mode? This is what's
in Properties:
er.extensions.ERXApplication.developmentMode=false
Has that changed?
Chuck
On Oct 1, 2008, at 4:03 PM, William Hatch wrote:
Other interesting facts:
Here's the path it's looking for with 5.4, notice the underscores
surrounding wr, this isn't valid and the file isn't found, so
nothing actually works. Not that it matters, as most people bail
long before the page loads anyway;-)
http://w2.int.ourserver.com:8000/ourapp/WebObjects/ourapp.woa/_wr_/wodata=/var/lib/tomcat5/webapps/ourapp/WEB-INF/Library/Frameworks/Ajax.framework/WebServerResources/prototype.js
In 5.3 wonder, it's the same path except without the _ surrounding
wr, and the page loads super fast. What the heck?
On Oct 1, 2008, at 6:44 PM, William Hatch wrote:
Sorry for the cross post; the Wonder list seems to be down.
5.4.3 and latest wonder for 5.4, tomcat 6
Just upgraded a project from 5.3 to latest, and now we're
observing extreme slowdowns in page load with any component that
relies on wonder ajax. running ySLow under firefox indicates that
each required resource is taking about ten seconds to load, so the
over all page loads in about 30 seconds; ~10 for prototype and
another ~20 for ibox, which appears to have to load twice. What's
the change we need to make in order to bring this back inline? One
of the reasons we're keen on upgrading is having more control over
loading these resources, and IIRC MIke mentioned something about
this recently here or on the blog. Ideally, we'd like to move
these to a static includes. This doesn't happen at all in 5.3
with the correct Wonder frameworks.
Thanks
Bill
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden