• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Cappuccino
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cappuccino


  • Subject: Re: Cappuccino
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 15:19:32 -0700


On Sep 5, 2008, at 1:52 PM, Florijan Stamenkovic wrote:

Uhm, I've taken a peek at the API. Seems to have some interesting stuff in there. Very AppKit like. I wonder what Apple would have to say about that, legally. Still, 117 classes to cover everything from basic raw type encapsulation to high level GUI management??? Sounds weak and I have doubts about how extendable the low level API is, and how easy it would be to integrate custom stuff into it. Which is crucial for library development... Which is crucial for a language... Which is, well, just crucial.

I wondered about that when I saw:

280 North formed earlier this year when three friends from USC got together to realize their dream of working together to develop software. Francisco Tolmasky and Ross Boucher graduated from USC in 2006 and 2007 respectively

It takes a while to get a sense of good API design.


Well, we'll see...

Yes.

Chuck




As for the replacement of JavaClient? Hm, I'd say it'd be more suited to a JSON-RPC style solution. Dave has a point in pointing out EOF libraries on the client. I would not count on Apple implementing those in Cappuccino...

F

On Sep 05, 2008, at 16:04, Guido Neitzer wrote:

On 05.09.08 13:43, "Chuck Hill" <email@hidden> wrote:

That is fine for document centric apps.  My uneducated, uninformed
guess is that using this to replace JavaClient would be a lot of
work.  It might be interesting to try.

I know. I guess, you can provide some sort of JSON data source and use that
in the way you had to when there was no CoreData - populate arrays and so
on.


Yeah, there should be something for that. Might be coming pretty soon ...

The framework itself looks really cool.

cug


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


-- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects







_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Cappuccino
      • From: Alan Ward <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Cappuccino (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Cappuccino (From: Florijan Stamenkovic <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Inherited Relationships using Different Destinations
  • Next by Date: Re: Cappuccino
  • Previous by thread: Re: Cappuccino
  • Next by thread: Re: Cappuccino
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread