• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Question about search performance
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question about search performance


  • Subject: Re: Question about search performance
  • From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 08:06:12 -0600
  • Thread-topic: Question about search performance

FrontBase doesn't do that. At least not in the versions I used.

cug

On 17.09.08 07:42, "Ken Anderson" <email@hidden> wrote:

> I had a similar problem with Oracle a while ago.  Queries run from the
> command line or a SQL editor took far less time than ones generated by
> EOF.  In the end, it turned out that the problem was related to using
> parameter passing (since EOF always parameterized the queries... it
> was really comparing apples to oranges).  For Oracle, I had to do this
> to solve the problem:
>
> -Doracle.jdbc.V8Compatible=true
>
> Anyway, I realize on FrontBase this doesn't help you very much, but
> you might want to consider that the adaptor is sending the query in a
> different way than you would manually...
>
> Ken
>
> On Sep 16, 2008, at 3:31 PM, Joshua Dubey wrote:
>
>> Hi Chuck,
>>
>> I am timing the app queries based on what EOAdaptorDebugEnabled
>> shows.  In each case, only one row is returned, so I'm guessing the
>> difference is not caused by any EOF overhead that might be going on.
>>
>> For the runs against database, I am timing thusly:
>>
>> Timing start;
>> <query as pasted from EOAdaptorDebugEnabled logs>;
>> timing stop;
>>
>> Just ran the above of again, with freshly cut and pasted SQL to be
>> sure, same result.
>>
>> Regardless, I will see about having the schema change done.
>>
>> Thanks for the prompt response.
>>
>> Josh
>>
>> On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:40 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 16, 2008, at 10:35 AM, Joshua Dubey wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I am seeing some search performance behavior I don't understand
>>>> and am hoping someone can provide some insight.
>>>>
>>>> We have an application that searches a very large table (millions
>>>> of rows) for orders.  We have options to search with wild cards,
>>>> and and do case insensitive searches.  Typical generated SQL for
>>>> case insensitive wild card search looks like this:
>>>>
>>>> SELECT <bunch of attributes>, from ORDERS T0 WHERE
>>>> UPPER(T0.EMAIL_ADDRESS) LIKE UPPER('email@hidden%') ESCAPE '\;
>>>>
>>>> This query can take up to a minute and a half.   It takes the same
>>>> amount of time whether the query is run directly against our
>>>> database or using our application.  This is what I would expect.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A case insensitive non wild card search produces SQL below
>>>>
>>>> SELECT <bunch of attributes>, from ORDERS T0 WHERE
>>>> UPPER(T0.EMAIL_ADDRESS) LIKE UPPER('email@hidden') ESCAPE '\;
>>>>
>>>> Here is what I don't understand:  If I run the above query
>>>> directly against our database, it takes about 12 seconds.
>>>
>>> I am somewhat surprised it would run that fast.  Are you certain
>>> you are timing this exact query?
>>>
>>>
>>>> However, running it through the app still takes about a minute and
>>>> a half.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone explain why this might be from an EOF perspective?
>>>
>>> Not immediately.  But I would just avoid this whole issue and make
>>> the column collate case insensitively:
>>>
>>> ALTER COLUMN "ORDERS"."EMAIL_ADDRESS" TO COLLATE
>>> INFORMATION_SCHEMA.CASE_INSENSITIVE;
>>>
>>>
>>> Both will be much faster.
>>>
>>>
>>> Chuck
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Chuck Hill             Senior Consultant / VP Development
>>>
>>> Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
>>> overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
>>> problems.
>>> http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
m
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
m
>
> This email sent to email@hidden


 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

References: 
 >Re: Question about search performance (From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: EOGenerator Relationships
  • Next by Date: Re: EOGenerator Relationships
  • Previous by thread: Re: Question about search performance
  • Next by thread: Re: Question about search performance
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread