Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 09:16:31 +0200
Am 01.04.2009 um 08:56 schrieb Phillip Hutchings:
Cocoa/WebObject's collection classes describe _intent_, not method. In
fact, in Cocoa the underlying implementation actually changes as you
use it.
Java's collection classes describe the method. They assume that you
have a reasonable idea of what you're doing.
Which helps you not really with the Weak*, Synchronized* and TreeMap
for example, as they have actual functionality changes, not merely
runtime differences. So it's not "fair" to list those when comparing
class count.
Cheers, Anjo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden