• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: App Engine supports Java
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: App Engine supports Java


  • Subject: Re: App Engine supports Java
  • From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 19:42:19 +0200

Dunno... basically BigTable is the same as Amazons SimpleDB: a loose property store with no relations in it. You can model them with some tricks, though. But it still doesn't make that good of a match with EOF.

I'd rather wonder how they run their "servlets"? Can they keep state? How?

Cheers, Anjo

Am 08.04.2009 um 19:30 schrieb David Holt:

I found this little snippet from way back in 03:

Damon Clinkscales's "Object Persistence Approaches" presentation further compared JDO and EJB with WebObjects's Enterprise Objects Framework (EOF). EOF is a third-party object persistence framework library owned by Apple and provides the technology behind the Apple e-commerce Website. Since EOF is a pure Java library, it does not require complex containers (EJB) or byte code post-processors (JDO). EOF provides access to the generated raw SQL, and adaptors can provide access to nonrelational datastores. However, EOF is a nonstandard vendor-specific technology. It requires the developer to learn the proprietary API and creates vendor lock-in.

http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-03-2003/jw-0314-nfjs.html?page=3

So it sounds like a specific adaptor will have to be created for the Google Datastore?



On 8-Apr-09, at 9:50 AM, Guido Neitzer wrote:

On 8. Apr. 2009, at 07:34 , Anjo Krank wrote:

http://googleappengine.blogspot.com/

WO in the cloud, anyone?

Hmmm. I guess that could be really interesting if there were an EOF integration for JDO. Will have to look into that. It's definitely an interesting option.


cug
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden

_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: App Engine supports Java
      • From: Q <email@hidden>
    • Re: App Engine supports Java
      • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
References: 
 >App Engine supports Java (From: Anjo Krank <email@hidden>)
 >Re: App Engine supports Java (From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>)
 >Re: App Engine supports Java (From: David Holt <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: App Engine supports Java
  • Next by Date: Re: EOEditingContext Lock/Unlock best practice?
  • Previous by thread: Re: App Engine supports Java
  • Next by thread: Re: App Engine supports Java
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread