• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: [OT] local persistence ORM
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OT] local persistence ORM


  • Subject: Re: [OT] local persistence ORM
  • From: Stamenkovic Florijan <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:10:37 -0400

Hi Daniel,

This looks quite interesting... JavaPersistence's API makes much more sense to me then JDO's. I have some questions about JP however, if you have a moment to answer them:

1. How complicated is the glue layer between JP, and MSAccess / Derby?
2. Do you have to define the database schema on both layer manually? Or is there some sort of an automation involved in this process?
3. Are there any significant ORM-feature differences between WO and JP?
4. Can JP conveniently deliver info on the database shema? Info such as a list of properties, attributes, relationships, inverse relationships, attribute classes... Or maybe does one have to manually extract that from the annotations using reflection?
5. JP seems to rely heavily on annotations. I have never worked much with annotations... What are your experiences with this approach?
6. JP seems to required quite a bit of typing to define even the simplest entities. Do you have problems with scaling, when defining a complex schemas?


Thanks,
F

On Apr 09, 2009, at 23:03, Daniel Mejía wrote:

Hi,

To have persistence in the client I'm using the JavaPersistence API with NetBeans. Here you can find an example with MS Access, but also works fine with Derby.

http://wiki.netbeans.org/JavaPersistenceApi

Saludos,

Daniel.

On 09/04/2009, at 07:35 p.m., email@hidden wrote:

From: Stamenkovic Florijan <email@hidden>
Date: 9 de abril de 2009 04:29:12 p.m. GMT-05:00
To: David Avendasora <email@hidden>
Cc: Development WebObjects <email@hidden>
Subject: Re: [OT] local persistence ORM


Nope...

1) I am not allowed to bundle all of WO into my client app.
2) This should be light-weight. Both in terms of the API and the library size. WO is neither.


Thx,
F


_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: [OT] local persistence ORM
      • From: Daniel Mejía <email@hidden>
    • Re: [OT] local persistence ORM
      • From: John Ours <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: [OT] local persistence ORM (From: Daniel Mejía <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: [OT] local persistence ORM
  • Next by Date: Re: [OT] local persistence ORM
  • Previous by thread: Re: [OT] local persistence ORM
  • Next by thread: Re: [OT] local persistence ORM
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread