Re: GVC EOFValidation "Voodoo"
Re: GVC EOFValidation "Voodoo"
- Subject: Re: GVC EOFValidation "Voodoo"
- From: Johnny Miller <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 14:25:20 -1000
No, let me upgrade the framework and see what happens.
Best,
Johnny On Dec 1, 2009, at 2:22 PM, David Avendasora wrote: Hi Johnny,
Looking at the current GVC version of the EOModelNotificationProxy instead of the Practical WO version, that "Voodoo" comment line (and it's following code) is:
// Voodoo. Bug fixed in WO 5.4.2 (or at least causes a stack overflow error) if ( ! ERXApplication.isWO54()) { EOClassDescription.classDescriptionForClass(((Class)notification.object())); }
Is this what the version of the Practical WO EOModelNotificationProxy looks like?
Dave On Dec 1, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Johnny Miller wrote: Hi,
I'm getting a stack overflow when accessing an eo from a direct action. It's a basic login and the DA talks to the Session object.
at com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOClassDescription.classDescriptionForClass(EOClassDescription.java:248) at com.apress.practicalwo.practicalutilities.EOModelNotificationProxy.classDescriptionNeededForClass(EOModelNotificationProxy.java:291) ... skipped 7 stack elements
When I look at the source written above the line
EOClassDescription.classDescriptionForClass(((Class)notification.object()));
is a comment that reads "voodoo"
I'm going to keep plugging away but any advice would be appreciated.
Best,
Johnny Miller Kahalawai Media Corp
David Avendasora Senior Software Engineer K12, Inc.
***** ***** *****
Johnny Miller Kahalawai Media Corp
|
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden