Re: WireHose and Wonder [was: GVC EOFValidation "Voodoo"]
Re: WireHose and Wonder [was: GVC EOFValidation "Voodoo"]
- Subject: Re: WireHose and Wonder [was: GVC EOFValidation "Voodoo"]
- From: Jean Pierre Malrieu <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 23:18:50 +0100
I would say the opposite.
WireHose implements most important functionalities in delegates or
defines them in interfaces (providing default implementions you can
copy), so you can continue extending ERXApplication, ERXGenericRecord,
and so on.
The only thing you cannot extend is ERXComponent if you want to use
WHComponent. Not a big deal... WireHose layout is not the strong part
of the framework, anyway.
There are a few non-blocking bugs you can easily live with when you do
not extend WHApplication.
I am using WireHose with Wonder and I am pretty happy with it.
I am just worried that I choosed a wrong option in the mid term as
WireHose does not seem to be activelly developped, and no longer has
community suport.
Gary, are you listening? Can you tell us something about WireHose
future?
JPM
My guess is "No", not in the sense of extending ERXApplication and
friends. I could be wrong.
Chuck
On Dec 2, 2009, at 11:15 AM, André Mitra wrote:
Do WireHose and Wonder co-exist peacefully?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden