Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]
Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]
- Subject: Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]
- From: Kieran Kelleher <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 14:32:22 -0500
It is an anonymous subclass. (I guess that is the correct term)
If you look at the creation of the WKEOUtils.OptimisticLockAction
creation earlier in this thread, it is the same thing. Each time we
create an OptimisticLockAction, we create a different subclass of the
abstract OL Action class with a new doPerform method. That after
creation ,we can it.
Same technique used in ERXEOAccessUtilities.ChannelAction.
On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:21 PM, Ricardo J. Parada wrote:
On Dec 3, 2009, at 2:16 PM, Anjo Krank wrote:
return new ERXEC(os) {
public boolean useAutoLock() {return false;}
public boolean coalesceAutoLocks() {return false;}
};
Pardon my ignorance... Is this valid Java code, I mean creating and
object followed by a { .. } block? What does that do?
:-)
Thanks,
Ricardo
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden