Re: And another EOF one-to-many qualifier to use?
Re: And another EOF one-to-many qualifier to use?
- Subject: Re: And another EOF one-to-many qualifier to use?
- From: Amiel Montecillo <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 08:02:19 +0800
Hi Chuck,
Can this be solved with Wonder alone? A simple yes/no would suffice.
Then again if you are feeling the holiday season and would like to elaborate more I'd appreciate it.
Thanks,
Amiel
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Chuck Hill
<email@hidden> wrote:
You need Wonder and / or the Houdah frameworks for their additional qualifiers.
There are a few different ways to get what you want. Sometimes you need to experiment with different ones to get the SQL that you want.
Chuck
On Dec 2, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Amiel Montecillo wrote:
Hello,
This may be a simple but it is really beating me up.
I have a one-to-many relationship User to many Keyword
What I need is the qualifier to get only a list of users without a single keyword. I know that I can just do users.keywords().count == 0 but I don't want that.
Can someone please beat some sense into me?
Thanks,
Amiel
--
socket error: unable to connect to 127.0.0.1
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (
email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to
email@hidden
--
socket error: unable to connect to 127.0.0.1
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden