Re: MySQL [was: Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]]
Re: MySQL [was: Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]]
- Subject: Re: MySQL [was: Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]]
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:29:45 -0800
On Dec 4, 2009, at 11:16 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote:
So, to sum up the pros and cons we heard in the discussion:
FOR MySQL
- Free
So is PG, FrontBase, and others so no a major Pro
- Easy to setup and configure
Uh, it does not work correctly out of the box so I think this is a con
- Clustering engine
- Easy reliable replication
Those two are really the only Pros that I can see for it. Those are
the only things that would make me use it
AGAINST MySQL
- Lack of deferred constraints
- Lack of transactional DDL (roll back failing migrations for
example). As Mike pointed out, neither does Oracle, so not alone
there.
- need to carefully configure it to get it to work correct
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden