Re: MySQL [was: Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]]
Re: MySQL [was: Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]]
- Subject: Re: MySQL [was: Re: Dr. Miguel 'Optimistic Locking' Arroz [was Re: WebObjects stress Testing tool?]]
- From: Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:07:50 -0800
On 4. Dec. 2009, at 17:46 , Mike Schrag wrote:
> That's what I'm referring ... I have not used it, only read about it enough to be intrigued by it. It requires your entire database to be loaded into memory, but memory is pretty damn cheap. If you have a truly HUGE database, this is not an option, but most of ours are not larger than the reasonable max amount of memory.
Personally I have only fairly small databases - big tables being in the couple hundred thousand rows range. Professionally, it's a different thing. Big table in the couple billion rows tables.
> Oracle's a weird cat ... On the one hand, it his this weird pile of ancient restrictions (31 char column name limits, etc). On the other hand, it's insanely fast. I don't have real scientific comparisons to back this up, but anecdotally, it's fast as hell.
Yeah, it's really weird. When I used it, I found it pretty cumbersome. Which might have to do with the fact that with the license cost, normally a DBA comes within the box ... so they don't really care about making it usable for mere mortals.
cug
--
http://www.event-s.net
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden