• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional


  • Subject: Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:24:19 -0800


On Feb 17, 2009, at 9:58 AM, Ondřej Čada wrote:

Hi,

On Feb 17, 2009, at 6:20 PM, Stamenkovic Florijan wrote:

Just for reference, is that my fault or WO fault? To be quite frank, I cannot find in specifications the exact API contract for this... I've always thought the C rules apply there (i.e., for any numeric value, nonzero equals true), but quite clearly they do not :(

The Java language specification does not allow conversion of non- boolean primitives to boolean primitives. The java.lang.Number API is consistent with this: it does not have a boolean-export method. In short: there is no contract for this.


What on earth has Java and its contracts to do with this?!?

WebObjects are no Java; it's a language-independent framework, actually designed for Objective C. The assumption that its number-to- boolean translation is C-like is thus well-founded and very reasonable (of course, unless _its_ documentation says otherwise).

The problem is "how exactly WebObjects should translate numeric objects to boolean in .wod bindins". That's what should be somewhere in the WO documentation (defintely not Java one), but I can't find it there :(

This functionality is in WOAssociation, booleanValueInComponent. Clearly what you are seeing is a bug in the implementation as the behavior does not match the documentation. Please file a bug.



Anyway, this problem is pretty unimportant -- it's just an interesting question, but it's of no real consequence. The really important question is

No I have no ideas, other than to use Wonder's patching to install a fixed WOAssociation class.


Chuck




On Feb 17, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Ondřej Čada wrote:

... does anybody know some trick how to find in a medium-sized project (about 16000 .wod lines in total) all WOConditionals whose condition is a BigDecimal, and append ".signum" to the condition?

(The project's Xcode, so I can use its regexp search&replace, or of course some external sed-based script... but I see no way to find the BigDecimal conditions only :( )

:)

Thanks and best,
---
Ondra Čada
OCSoftware:     email@hidden               http://www.ocs.cz
private         email@hidden             http://www.ocs.cz/oc



_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


-- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects







_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >BigDecimal vs WOConditional (From: Ondřej Čada <email@hidden>)
 >Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional (From: Stamenkovic Florijan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional (From: Ondřej Čada <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional
  • Next by Date: Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional
  • Previous by thread: Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional
  • Next by thread: Re: BigDecimal vs WOConditional
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread