• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: A tiny bug in AjaxFunctionLink class
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A tiny bug in AjaxFunctionLink class


  • Subject: Re: A tiny bug in AjaxFunctionLink class
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:48:48 -0800


On Jan 14, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:

if you see the available bindings, there are:

onclick, but should be onClick ( uppercase 'C' ), is just annoying because is easy to mistake. can you check?


This should be on the Wonder list. There seems to be a lot of inconsistency in the use between onclick and onClick. But changing it now will break existing code. Both would have to be allowed.

Mike, thoughts?

Chuck


-- Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects







_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: A tiny bug in AjaxFunctionLink class
      • From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
References: 
 >A tiny bug in AjaxFunctionLink class (From: Amedeo Mantica <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: A tiny bug in AjaxFunctionLink class
  • Next by Date: Re: How do I debug this jdbc error?
  • Previous by thread: A tiny bug in AjaxFunctionLink class
  • Next by thread: Re: A tiny bug in AjaxFunctionLink class
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread