• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install


  • Subject: Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install
  • From: Stamenkovic Florijan <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:08:10 -0400

John,

On Jan 20, 2009, at 10:28, John Pollard wrote:

Hi Florijan,

Many thanks for your reply. I was kind of aware that Eclipse did something different when using incremental build; a recent post I made gave an example where compiles worked on the incremental build but not in ant. I should point out that this was all working before I upgraded to recent versions of Eclipse and the nightly WOLips. So the ant clean install did previously put the gif files into the jar, or at least didn't remove them!

Yeah, I'd guess that earlier versions of the install target did not do a clean -> compile -> bundle, but just compile -> bundle.


Although this is client side code, it is already in its own separate project, so doesn't get any special client-side treatment other than this gif bundling within the jar which is just done using patternset rules, so nothing special within build.xml. My jnlp is manually edited and managed and my deployment scripts copy the jar to the appropriate place for java web start access.

So, you have a separate client side project... I think that is a good way of handling it, I also keep my client side stuff separate. However, I don't understand then the ant build confusion. Is your client side project a WOLips project, or just a standard Java project? Or an ant based Java project? Also, where are those .gif resources located? In which project I mean...


If your client side project is a WOLips project, may I ask why? How do you have it set up?

I have not tried turning off the incremental builder, I just assumed that coding is more pleasant with it on and didn't have a reason that I knew of to change this before.

Yes, it is more pleasant. I have to wait for the ant build to do all of it's stuff every time that I save any server side changes. However, since my server projects are quite simple in general, this works fine for me, and gives me results more consistent with the final deployment. Though this may have improved with the latest WOLips classpath handling.


Best regards,
F
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install
      • From: John Pollard <email@hidden>
References: 
 >ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install (From: John Pollard <email@hidden>)
 >Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install (From: Stamenkovic Florijan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install (From: John Pollard <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Changing eogenerator templates
  • Next by Date: Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install
  • Previous by thread: Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install
  • Next by thread: Re: ant clean install versus Eclipse/WOLips clean install
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread