Re: JavaXML.framework replacement
Re: JavaXML.framework replacement
- Subject: Re: JavaXML.framework replacement
- From: Dov Rosenberg <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:52:52 -0400
- Thread-topic: JavaXML.framework replacement
We ended up doing exactly that. If you deploy your apps as a servlet the
JavaXML framework is not even loaded by the servlet container because it
contains servlet classes like HTTPRequest. The J2EE spec that any jar that
contains those classes will be ignored by the classloader. Which means all
of the other things that you thought you were using were also not being
loaded from that jar.
Dov
On 7/1/09 8:48 AM, "David Avendasora" <email@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to figure out the best way to replace any jars required by
> projects that in the past were provided by the JavaXML.framework.
>
> Should I simply download the latest versions of the needed jars from
> their original sources and put them in my Libraries directory?
>
> While I'm sure Maven would be a possible solution for this, right now
> I'm looking for the non-maven (Fluffy Bunny Layout) solution.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Dave
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden