Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
- Subject: Re: A WebObjects article on Appleinsider
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 09:01:11 -0700
On Jul 8, 2009, at 5:46 AM, William Hatch wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 7:04 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
Yeah, this is really good news. Now that WO releases won't be tied
to OS X and Xcode releases, I'm betting we'll see far more frequent
releases of updates to the frameworks.
seriously? I remember the exact inverse statements being made when,
only four-ish years ago, they tied WO's release schedule back into
the main development tools. I think it's good news, but hopefully it
means that they'll stop developing their unnecessary deployment that
virtually nobody uses
??? I'd guest that the majority of WO projects are deployed like
this. Servlet deployment is a distant second.
Chuck
and focus on the frameworks instead. I hate the thought of one more
minute going into maintaining wotaskd, monitor and everything else
that goes along with WebObjects as a stand alone application server.
They should have done it long ago, and in all honesty, we should
have been willing to let that go a long time ago, if it would have
helped with resources inside apple devoted to developing WO.
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden