Re: javaxml.jar, war deploys, and sanity vs serenity
Re: javaxml.jar, war deploys, and sanity vs serenity
- Subject: Re: javaxml.jar, war deploys, and sanity vs serenity
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:32:42 -0700
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:23 AM, David Holt wrote:
On 8-Jul-09, at 11:09 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 11:03 AM, David Avendasora wrote:
On Jul 8, 2009, at 1:22 PM, William Hatch wrote:
I wouldn't have expected it to be coming from one of core
frameworks given the outstanding nature of support for war
deployments....
WAR deployment is a piece of cake, unless it's broke, then it
sucks, big time. :-/
That describes WO deployment in general. In fact, that describes
WO in general.
Why stop there? It pretty much defines life too :-)
Not all of life. MS technology pretty much sucks even when it is not
broken.
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
| References: | |
| | >javaxml.jar, war deploys, and sanity vs serenity (From: William Hatch <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: javaxml.jar, war deploys, and sanity vs serenity (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: javaxml.jar, war deploys, and sanity vs serenity (From: William Hatch <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: javaxml.jar, war deploys, and sanity vs serenity (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>) |
| | >Re: javaxml.jar, war deploys, and sanity vs serenity (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>) |