Re: Rich Clients and WO
Re: Rich Clients and WO
- Subject: Re: Rich Clients and WO
- From: John Huss <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:08:43 -0500
I believe JavaClient uses the standard Java serialization, which is a binary format. Generating the format in _javascript_ is probably not feasible; if it was I'm sure the GWT folks would have used it, but they didn't.
Also, JavaClient's serialization is HEAVY since the whole EC is transferred (I think) with each request to the server,which kind of makes sense actually, but is possibly an expensive operation.
Also, you would have to rewrite EOEditingContext and related classes in _javascript_, which is a fairly large task.
John
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 9:57 AM, David Avendasora
<email@hidden> wrote:
Hi all,
I have a question that I think I can finally put into words after an excellent WOWODC, especially the session on _javascript_ Clients.
Why not use the already built-in com.webobjects.eodistribution classes as the interface for passing EOs and such back and forth instead of re-inventing the wheel? This is how a JavaClient application passes EOs and ECs back and forth between the client and server, and the default method is HTTP using POST commands. Couldn't a _javascript_ client simply leverage that existing interface to the server-side EOF stack?
Dave
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden