• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects


  • Subject: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
  • Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:17:13 -0700

Hi!

On 2009/06/13, at 05:58, Pascal Robert wrote:

My assumption is this means it doesn't have the Java apps (javamonitor, wotaskd, etc) installed by default. You can still install the WO runtime, and you can always deploy to a servlet.

Just like it was before Tiger Server.

  And that's a REALLY good thing. I always get pissed off when I upgrade Mac OS X Server, and the WO installation is also upgraded, causing my apps to break or malfunction. Separating both is really good news for me.

  Yours

Miguel Arroz

...........................
http://www.survs.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
      • From: David LeBer <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Yung-Luen Lan <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Phillip Hutchings <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: [Solved] Odd cookie expiration behaviour (Safari related?)
  • Next by Date: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • Previous by thread: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • Next by thread: Re: Snow Leopard compatibility and the future of webobjects
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread