• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes


  • Subject: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:45:15 +1000

On 16/06/2009, at 1:36 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:

On Jun 15, 2009, at 6:55 PM, Lachlan Deck wrote:

On 16/06/2009, at 11:30 AM, Michael Schrag wrote:

Maven == Ant cubed. Or maybe Obsfucated Ant. :-P
Chuck, are you speaking from experience here or just shootin' the breeze? David, do you know how much 'set-up' is required to use maven with Hudson?
All this toying around with environments etc sounds tiring. :-)
I've had the pleasure of using Maven some now and you're not really giving the full story here

Well I wasn't attempting to give the full story - only what's related to building under hudson (which I believe this topic was about). Sure there's a couple of other steps involved in setting up maven overall but I think it misleading (though I know Chuck's mostly joking

No, not joking for what I thought the topic was, "difficulty in debugging build problems in Ant vs Maven".


... but others believe him word-for-word) to keep suggesting that by using maven you're problems would be exponentially more difficult. Then again - Chuck was probably 'goating' a response :-)

Ouch!

In my experience with maven, setting up a new machine is relatively painless because all of the configuration is self contained. That is the point I was attempting to make.

I agree that is is very good for dependancy management when (a) the dependancy still exists in the repository (b) the repository still exists (c) there are no build problems

Sometimes this is the case, particularly when you control all the repositories. It certainly has NOT been the case for all the Mavenized projects that I have tried to build, especially over a few years. People "clean up" repositories. Shit breaks.

No worries- look this turned into a much more serious (tone-wise) discussion than I intended. My initial reply was meant to be taken a bit more light-hearted... the woes of email :-)


with regards,
--

Lachlan Deck
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: David Avendasora <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: Michael Schrag <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • Next by Date: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • Previous by thread: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • Next by thread: Re: Hudson and Client-Side Classes
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread