Re: Escaping in strings according to WOML
Re: Escaping in strings according to WOML
- Subject: Re: Escaping in strings according to WOML
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:31:53 -0400
* technically mixed wod/inline isn't a limitation of their parser, but
it's a practical limitation of the way it's loaded ... so I'll list it
in the pro column for woognl
* helper functions = pro -- it can be done with their association
factory, but at a syntactic sacrifice, i think
* though not technically a parser feature, I think our if/else syntax
makes more logical sense -- this is a total religious debate though
* they have var: which is pretty cool -- we could just add this to
wonder pretty easily, though
* ours = much less strict parser ... this is a pro or a con depending
on your perspective, but the fact is that we are more forgiving than
theirs, and that seems better for most users. the catch is that to get
<div id="$whatever"> support, you have to turn on strict parsing for
ours, too (which they have by default, and so you can just do it by
default)
i'm hoping this decision will not be as difficult (or exist) in future
versions
ms
On Jun 29, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Amedeo Mantica wrote:
Just a question...
The pro/cons using WOOGNL instead WO 5.4 inline bindings ?
1) mixed inline and wod
2) ...?
n) ... ?
On 29/giu/09, at 13:49, Mike Schrag wrote:
I sent all my examples from WOWODC to Mike Schrag after the
presentation; hopefully he could put them someplace where people
can get them.
btw ... Drew's examples will be part of the WOWODC video release.
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden