Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:01:35 -0700
On Mar 31, 2009, at 10:58 AM, Dan Grec wrote:
On 31-Mar-09, at 9:49 AM, Chuck Hill wrote:
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Simon McLean wrote:
Crikey. For a while I've been tempted to suggest that we move the
whole of Wonder to use the "get" prefix
Grrrrrr
Can I ask why WO as a whole doesn't use the 'get' prefix?
It is a silly Java hack for JavaBeans. It adds no value to the method
name, just makes it longer. It makes it harder to parse a list of
methods as so many are named get...
To start with.
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden