Re: Getters without the "get" part
Re: Getters without the "get" part
- Subject: Re: Getters without the "get" part
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:21:15 -0400
On Mar 31, 2009, at 8:31 AM, Simon McLean wrote:
Crikey. For a while I've been tempted to suggest that we move the
whole of Wonder to use the "get" prefix
Grrrrrr
Can I ask why WO as a whole doesn't use the 'get' prefix?
The real reason WO doesn't use "get" is that it was machine-converted
from Objective-C to Java and Objective-C convention is to not use "get"
ms
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden