Lists

Terms and Conditions
Lists hosted on this site
Email the Postmaster
Tips for posting to public mailing lists

Re: Ternary op + autoboxing + null value = NPE?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ternary op + autoboxing + null value = NPE?

Subject: Re: Ternary op + autoboxing + null value = NPE?
From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:52:43 -0700


On Oct 19, 2009, at 8:37 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:

I personally don't like boxing -- I think it's very misleading and leads to weird bugs like this.

+1


--
Chuck Hill             Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems. http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


Follow-Ups:

Re: Ternary op + autoboxing + null value = NPE?
From: Lachlan Deck <email@hidden>


References:  
  >Ternary op + autoboxing + null value = NPE? (From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>)
  >Re: Ternary op + autoboxing + null value = NPE? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)




Prev by Date:
Re: ERIndexing (was: How to achieve a fuzzy match searcher)

Next by Date:
Re: Replacing the Session Timeout message

Previous by thread:
Re: Ternary op + autoboxing + null value = NPE?

Next by thread:
Re: Ternary op + autoboxing + null value = NPE?

Index(es):

Date
Thread