• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither?


  • Subject: Re: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither?
  • From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:14:48 +1300

Hi Mike;

Thanks for the update –– it sounds like 3.5 Carbon might be worth a crack!

cheers.

Carbon is better, but there is no 3.5 carbon Maclipse. Cocoa is definitely VERY laggy, 10.5 or 10.6. There are some very substantial performance problems. There is a new SWT guy who seems to be quite a bit more responsive to Mac SWT requests, so that bodes well.
q has been bringing forward fixes from 3.6 into maclipse, so it IS getting better.
I don't know of any particular instability issues with WOLips on 3.5.

___ Andrew Lindesay www.lindesay.co.nz

_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden


References: 
 >Eclipse 3.5 – Cocoa / Carbon or Neither? (From: Andrew Lindesay <email@hidden>)
 >RE: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither? (From: "Beatty, Daniel D CIV NAVAIR, 474300D" <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither? (From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Snow Leopard and TimeZones
  • Next by Date: RE: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither?
  • Previous by thread: Re: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither?
  • Next by thread: RE: Eclipse 3.5 - Cocoa / Carbon or Neither?
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread