Re: Mootools + Wonder's Ajax Framework
Re: Mootools + Wonder's Ajax Framework
- Subject: Re: Mootools + Wonder's Ajax Framework
- From: David Holt <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:18:02 -0700
Nice work!
d
On 18-Sep-09, at 2:09 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
It could use a good refactoring - in the beginning I was really
muddling around by the end it was getting really easy to make new
components. The createAjaxOptions methods makes it really easy to
port ready-made MooTools plugins to WebObjects components. Porting
Wonder.js was pretty easy as well - specially because many of the
functions already exist in MooTools i.e. all the keyboard listeners.
Give me a week or two to comb through it and I'll send you what I
have.
However, I do have a site up that uses the framework.
On this page I have AUC, ASB and AUL working: http://
www.horsepost.com/search/horses - handles the pagination, search
filters etc...
On this page I have a new components based on the MooTools cover
flow plugin: http://www.horsepost.com/search/disciplines
On this page I have a new component based on MediaBoxAdvanced:
http://www.horsepost.com/horse/watch - click watch video
There's more if you dig through the site. The first version of
this site used prototype - the mootools version has been up since
Monday.
Thanks again,
Johnny
On Sep 18, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Mike Schrag wrote:
i'd be very interested to see the diffs ... how clean is the port?
did you keep the bindings intact? that was one of the big issues
when i first looked at this (actually for jquery) -- maintaing
full api compatibility was actually kind of tricky, but there are
impedance mismatches between the various libraries, and
Ajax.framework's bindings are very prototype/scriptaculous-specific.
On Sep 18, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to use Wonder's Ajax Framework with the MooTools
JavaScript framework. So I look at the components I needed (ASB,
AUC, AUL etc...) and ported them over to use MooTools on the
front end. I created some of my own components as well and I had
them extend either AjaxComponent or AjaxDynamicElement.
So far everything seems to be working well - does anyone think
there any pitfalls with this strategy?
Thanks in advance,
Johnny
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40mdimension.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
40kahalawai.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
@mac.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden