Re: New look for wocommunity.org
Re: New look for wocommunity.org
- Subject: Re: New look for wocommunity.org
- From: Haris Pobric <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:27:30 -0600
As someone who had to “fight”, often losing, battles for the use of
WO in actual projects I would recommend rewriting this page by stating
why WO is a great choice on its own (i.e. why it rocks as technology)
regardless of which particular development environment one happens to
be coming from. If comparisons with other tools (Rails, J2EE, PHP)
must be made they can be presented separately and it would be good to
write them in the vein of “everything you can do I can do (just as
well or) better”.
If there is any interest I can try to find time to put something
together later this week (this weekend is probably more realistic
timeframe).
Regards,
Haris Pobric
Appwerks, LLC
Visit us online at http://www.appwerks.com
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 1, 2010, at 7:03 PM, Guido Neitzer <email@hidden>
wrote:
Oh, my ...
That's why my first idea was to say "Chunk, please take a look" ;-)
Seriously, I can invest some time tonight, take a closer look from a
different angle and we can discuss that.
cug
On 1. Feb, 2010, at 4:58 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
It think the facts are good, but you are right: from a sales point
of view it looks at it from the wrong direction.
As a quick example,
But it’s in Java!
Yes, it’s Java, but it’s not J2EE. You don’t have to deal with
EJB, J2EE containers, Struts and the like. WebObjects uses Java fo
r its best features : major code libraries (JavaMail, Jakarta proj
ects, etc.) and portability.
Java on the Web, Done Right!
Enjoy working in a clean and elegantly designed set of coherent,
consistent frameworks. Delight in spending your time implementing
features instead of fussing with infrastructure. You don’t have t
o deal with EJB, J2EE containers, Struts and the like. There is n
o need to hand edit XML and use dependancy injection to get the pi
eces to co-operate. Of course, WebObjects has full access to the
universe of Java libraries (JavaMail, Jakarta projects, etc.) and
the portability Java developers depend on.
On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:43 PM, Guido Neitzer wrote:
The design is pretty nice! I like it.
But you still couldn't get rid of that defensive slogan on the
"Why WO?" page. It should say "Because it rocks!". Not mention any
other stuff ... This whole page is sooooo negative. I'd say that
needs some serious rewrite ...
cug
On 1. Feb, 2010, at 4:35 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Hello everyone,
wocommunity.org finally have a brand new look! Thanks to the
efforts of one of our community member, Sophiacom
(www.sophiacom.fr). Everything is much cleaner now, especially
the Screencasts page.
More stuff is coming soon in the Community section : personal and
organization profiles, and WO projects listing.
Again, thanks to Sophiacom for the new look.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their
overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific
problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
@mac.com
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden