Re: Question about ERAttachment.
Re: Question about ERAttachment.
- Subject: Re: Question about ERAttachment.
- From: Johnny Miller <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:35:07 -1000
That makes a lot of sense and I think I'm going to go the route you described.
On Feb 16, 2010, at 11:24 AM, David Holt wrote:
> Hi Johnny,
>
> On 2010-02-16, at 1:13 PM, Johnny Miller wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been using ERAttachment's image processor but on a new project I'm going to try out using the entire framework i.e. all the automagic file handling wonderment.
>>
>> A question on modeling the attachments.
>>
>> When you create the relationship between the entities' key and ERAttachment is that an optional one-to-one relationship or is it an optional one-to-many from your model to erattachment?
>
> I've found that both work. In practice, I always use the to-one and if I need a to-many I model it like this:
>
> Person ->> photo -> ERAttachment
>
> This way if you have any additional metadata to add about your attachment (in this case photo) that is not included in the default ERAttachment metadata, you're covered.
>
> If you don't foresee a need for additional metadata this also works:
>
> Person ->> ERAttachment (photos)
>
> HTH,
>
> David
>
>
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Johnny
>>
>>
>> Johnny Miller
>> Kahalawai Media Corp
>> http://www.kahalawai.com
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
Johnny Miller
Kahalawai Media Corp
http://www.kahalawai.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden