Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
- Subject: Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
- From: Lon Varscsak <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 16:24:12 -0700
Yes it is the same PK in both tables but there are no rows in the relationship. This is a pretty common practice and I just hate modeling a to-many and then provide interfaces as a to-one.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Travis Britt
<email@hidden> wrote:
Short answer: no. Is the PK not really a PK? If it is a real PK, how are there rows without it?
On Jan 13, 2010, at 5:53 PM, Lon Varscsak wrote:
> Is there a way to model an optional to-one relationship from the primary key to a primary key of another object?
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden