• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship


  • Subject: Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
  • From: Mark Ritchie <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:08:06 -0800

Hi Chuck!

On 14/Jan/2010, at 1:46 PM, Chuck Hill wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2010, at 3:36 AM, Mark Ritchie wrote:
>> Yes, I believe that's the intended behaviour... The DatabaseContext tracks that newly created EO and throws an exception if you attempt to modify and then save it.
> Almost, it throws when the fault is fired.

Hrm, in test case that I constructed, that's not what I observe.
I'm using WOF 5.4.3, Java 1.5 on my development machine.

Using the Movies EOModel and local mysql:
I fetch a Talent EO.
I ask for it's photo and get back a fault for the TalentPhoto EO (as expected.)
I fire the fault and get back a TalentPhoto EO with PK set and nil values.
EODatabaseContext.objectsWithMissingGlobalIds() confirms that it's tracking the TalentPhoto EO for me.
I make a change to the Talent EO and save it.
All is good.
I make changes to TalentPhoto:set a photo and set it's talent relationship to the Talent EO.
Then when I try to save changes, EOF tosses a EOObjectNotAvailableException with this explanation:

prepareForSaveWithCoordinator: Cannot save the object with globalID _EOIntegralKeyGlobalID[TalentPhoto (java.lang.Integer)1]. The row referenced by this globalID was missing from the database at the time a fetch was attempted. Either it was removed from the database after this application got a pointer to it, or there is a referential integrity problem with your database. To be notified when fetches fail, implement a delegate on EODatabaseContext that responds to databaseContextFailedToFetchObject().

That explanation seems to match what I've done and the behaviour seems to match the documentation for EODatabaseContext's delegate databaseContextFailedToFetchObject().  http://tr.im/dcdelegate

What am I doing differently then you?
M.

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
      • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Modeling an optional to-one relationship (From: Lon Varscsak <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship (From: Mark Ritchie <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship (From: Lon Varscsak <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship (From: Mark Ritchie <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship (From: Mark Ritchie <email@hidden>)
 >Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship (From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: WO Long Response and iPhone
  • Next by Date: Re: WO Long Response and iPhone
  • Previous by thread: Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
  • Next by thread: Re: Modeling an optional to-one relationship
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread