Re: Suggestions for best deployment?
Re: Suggestions for best deployment?
- Subject: Re: Suggestions for best deployment?
- From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 16:36:57 -0400
I haven't tried it yet, but WOlastic looks like a *really* cool
deployment solution for WO.
http://wolastic.com/
Ramsey
On Jul 26, 2010, at 4:27 PM, Ken Anderson wrote:
Thanks for the thoughts guys!
Ken
On Jul 26, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
Le 2010-07-26 à 12:55, Chuck Hill a écrit :
On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Ken Anderson wrote:
I've been asked to comment on the best way to deploy WebObjects
today without any "imposed" restrictions. I haven't done any new
deployments in a long while, so I'm likely not up to date on the
last. What are people using today, and why do they think it's
the best?
Thanks much!
Ken
Lacking imposed restrictions (e.g. must run in J2EE container),
traditional WO deployment through Apache with mod_webobjects is
probably the way to go. Anjo was working on mod_proxy deployment,
but I don't recall how far he got or if he has this in
production. It looked promising. There is also a Fast CGI
adaptor and Ravi is working on something for WOWODC.
I'm adding some mods in JavaMonitor too (for WOWODC) and Andrew
Lindesay also have stuff in LEWOStuff to use mod_proxy_ajp.
----
Pascal Robert
email@hidden
AIM: MacTICanada
Twitter : MacTICanada
LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/macti
WO Community profile : http://wocommunity.org/page/member?
name=probert
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden