Re: inline bindings and valid...
Re: inline bindings and valid...
- Subject: Re: inline bindings and valid...
- From: Theodore Petrosky <email@hidden>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 09:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
Eclipse Platform
Version: 3.5.2.R35x_v20100210-0800-9hEiFzmFst-TiEn9hNYgDWg1XN8ulH_JvCNGB
Build id: M20100211-1343
WOLips 3.5.6066
I will check out the warning settings...
thanks,
Ted
--- On Sat, 6/19/10, Mike Schrag <email@hidden> wrote:
> From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
> Subject: Re: inline bindings and valid...
> To: "Farrukh Ijaz" <email@hidden>
> Cc: "Theodore Petrosky" <email@hidden>, "WebObjects List" <email@hidden>
> Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010, 9:26 AM
> Ooooorrr change your validation
> settings and turn off the ones you think are stupid. The
> point of the warnings is to tell you when WOLips can't prove
> that the binding is correct. In this case, it's a @
> operator, which wolips can't just know because they're
> registered at runtime. So just go and turn off the "operator
> warnings" under validation settings and clean build or touch
> the file with the warning. Ignoring warnings just defeats
> the purpose have HAVING warnings, and will end up hiding the
> ones that you think ARE important.
>
> // VALID should work, though. i'm not sure which version
> you're using, though. I'll have to check trunk and see if it
> behaves as expected, but unless it's a regression that used
> to work.
>
> ms
>
> On Jun 19, 2010, at 9:15 AM, Farrukh Ijaz wrote:
>
> > Ignore these stupid warnings. You know better that the
> binding will work at runtime or not. Sometimes I get quite
> weird warnings with Eclipse which complains for missing WO
> components but I run the application without any problem.
> >
> > Two things you always do.
> >
> > Avoid using nightly builds and stick to stable
> versions of any API
> > Always give eclipse a bath by doing a restart
> (eclipse, not the machine) if you get warnings without any
> reason.
> >
> > Farrukh
> >
> > On 2010-06-19, at 4:07 PM, Theodore Petrosky wrote:
> >
> >> I tried that and it doesn't remove the warning:
> >>
> >> Unable to verify operator 'sum.amountOfTime //
> VALID'
> >>
> >>
> >> without the // VALID I get a warning:
> >>
> >> Unable to verify operator 'sum.amountOfTime'
> >>
> >> It is just a warning, I know... but I thought I
> was doing something wrong....
> >>
> >> Ted
> >>
> >>
> >> --- On Sat, 6/19/10, Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
> >>> Subject: Re: inline bindings and valid...
> >>> To: "Theodore Petrosky" <email@hidden>
> >>> Cc: email@hidden
> >>> Date: Saturday, June 19, 2010, 7:45 AM
> >>>> <wo:WOString value = "$email@hiddentOfTime"
> >>> numberformat = "##.##"/>
> >>>
> >>> <wo:WOString value = "$email@hiddentOfTime
> >>> // VALID" numberformat = "##.##"/>
> >>>
> >>> ms
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will
> be ignored.
> >> Webobjects-dev mailing list
> (email@hidden)
> >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> >>
> >> This email sent to email@hidden
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be
> ignored.
> > Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
> >
> > This email sent to email@hidden
>
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden