ERProfiling -> ERXBatchingDisplayGroup
ERProfiling -> ERXBatchingDisplayGroup
- Subject: ERProfiling -> ERXBatchingDisplayGroup
- From: Baiss Eric Magnusson <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 14:28:12 -0700
Well I perturbed the situation by removing 4 of the 6 WODisplayGroups, using the following kind of code (reverted back to ERXDisplayGroup for testing), small improvement, so big picture still is wrong.
NSMutableArray<Accounts> sortAccts = new NSMutableArray( theOwner.toAccounts() );
return (NSArray)_Utilities._sortEOsUsingSingleKey( sortAccts, "accountName");
public static NSMutableArray _sortEOsUsingSingleKey( NSMutableArray<?> array, String aKey ) throws NSComparator.ComparisonException {
NSArray orderings = new NSArray( EOSortOrdering.sortOrderingWithKey( aKey, EOSortOrdering.CompareAscending ));
EOSortOrdering.sortArrayUsingKeyOrderArray( array, orderings );
return array;
}
************************************************************************************
public ERXBatchingDisplayGroup<Transaction> curTrans;
curTrans.setObjectArray( theOwner.transaction() );
still throws. I look at "curTrans.queryBindings().toString() );" before the failed call
{endMonth = 2010-04-01 00:00:00 Etc/GMT; startMonth = 2010-03-01 00:00:00 Etc/GMT; }
However ERXBatchingDisplayGroup throws:
attempt to generate SQL for com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOKeyValueQualifier (date >= $startMonth) failed because the qualifier variable '$startMonth' is unbound
<date> is a <NSTimestamp> in the model.
And here's the ERXBatchingDisplayGroup <curTrans> in the debugger:
<er.extensions.batching.ERXBatchingDisplayGroup dataSource=com.webobjects.eoaccess.EODatabaseDataSource@2eb80f1c delegate=Class: 'com.webobjects.appserver.WODisplayGroup$Delegate' Object: <null> sortOrdering=(<class com.webobjects.eocontrol.EOSortOrdering(date compareDescending)>) qualifier=null localKeys=null insertedObjectDefaultValues={} numberOfObjectsPerBatch=99>
************************************************************************************
I changed the fetch to use the objects in
theOwner.transaction()
instead of also searching for the match of the primary key "acctId" along with the dates, isn't this a good change?
I will need to carry on to other pages.
----
Baiss Eric Magnusson
http://www.CascadeWebDesign.com
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden