Re: ?? about opportunistic locking...
Re: ?? about opportunistic locking...
- Subject: Re: ?? about opportunistic locking...
- From: Miguel Arroz <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 15:16:31 +0100
Hi!
On 2010/05/18, at 14:07, Miguel Arroz wrote:
> And, BTW, another detail for the most curious readers...
>
>>> Application.Application: C1 1274149686265
>>> Application.Application: C2 1274149686265
>
> If this attribute was an integer or long (with the timestamp, for instance) and not a string, in this specific situation, the second commit would not produce any SQL statement. Why? :)
Fix: it doesn't matter if it's a string, it only matters if those two values are equal(). Here, they aren't (C1 and C2 are part of the value). But if they did...
Never post before tea.
Yours
Miguel Arroz
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden