Re: Scala and WebObjects
Re: Scala and WebObjects
- Subject: Re: Scala and WebObjects
- From: Mike Schrag <email@hidden>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 06:34:20 -0500
>> Anjo should change his surname to Anjo Frank.
>
> You should talk. At least I have one :P
>
> To be clear: one of the selling points of Roo as no lock-in. You can use any number of JPA providers, you get code generated which you can customize pretty well via aspect-j (a part of which I would like to see in EO generator so one remove the weird _Foo classes) and you get this without any runtime jars at all.
Yeah I've wondered whether we should do class rewriting for _Foo and maybe even EO's period, like Hibernate does.
> So it's not D2W, but it's probably good enough to be workable. And given a certain company's abysmal track record in supporting enterprise software, it *might* be good enough for some to be actually considered as an viable alternative for WO/EOF.
I was pretty turned off by the demo video when I watched it a few weeks ago ... They LOOOVVVEEE xml files. It looked pretty tedious. That said, if you have to pick something other than WO, I guess you're going to have to sacrifice in some way :)
ms _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden