• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag
 

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Scala and WebObjects
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Scala and WebObjects


  • Subject: Re: Scala and WebObjects
  • From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 10:15:53 -0500

That's why I said "in the last 10 years" :-) And it was stuff coming out from research, not stuff used by Apple like WO is. I'm still waiting for OpenDoc comeback.

Hi everyone,

Your vision is too narrow. Apple _does_ give / sell their technologies to other people and it has happened recently.

Squeak (Smalltalk) is a good example. Giving it to Walt Disney and also the world at large:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeak

Dylan is another example. Giving it to Harlequin:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Dylan_programming_language

There are other examples...

Someone has to give Apple a reason to sell WO.

> Yeah, but Apple rarely give/sell their technologies to other
> people... In fact, I don't remember Apple selling any of their stuff
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Scala and WebObjects
      • From: Antonio Petri <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Re: Scala and WebObjects (From: email@hidden)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Oracle and Apple Announce OpenJDK Project for Mac OS X
  • Next by Date: Re: Scala and WebObjects
  • Previous by thread: Re: Scala and WebObjects
  • Next by thread: Re: Scala and WebObjects
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread