Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
- Subject: Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
- From: Michael Gargano <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 11:51:25 -0800
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
I think Mike and I should get together and form "The Association of Luddites Named Mike". That quote gives the term "syntactic sugar" a disturbing twist.
On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:27 PM, David Avendasora wrote:
> I just have to say, Mike is on a role this thread:
>
> 1) "If you DO become iTunes, Google, or Twitter, your app won't scale. Period. I've never seen a system that scales without investing substantial engineering effort in profiling and rearchitecture after deployment."
>
> 2) "The moral of the story is that every technology sucks, so you might as well just build it fast so it can suck in production faster and you can move on with your life."
>
> And Last, but certainly not least (and my favorite):
>
> 3) "Of course, the sad reality is that our industry loves to just syntactically masturbate with different languages and pretend that we're much better for it when the reality is that basically nothing has changed in 30 years in terms of how we actually solve problems."
>
> With the direction he's going, he's going to describe the relationship between Scala, Java and Ruby as some kind of twisted three-way.
>
> I can't wait!
>
> Dave
>
>
> On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:11 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>
>> Of course I meant "except ours" :) That's why my title is "Senior Engineer of Martini-Pouring Services," making sure we're all comfortably numb while we kick back and relax.
>>
>> ms
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Alan Ward wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Mike, couldn't you just have just left everyone with the cosy misconception that
>>> we wrote all this code 7 years ago, got it "right" first time and haven't had to touch it since?
>>>
>>> Alan
>>>
>>> On Nov 16, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Michael Gargano wrote:
>>>
>>>> "If you DO become iTunes, Google, or Twitter, your app won't scale. Period. I've never seen a system that scales without investing substantial engineering effort in profiling and rearchitecture after deployment."
>>>>
>>>> This made it to my wall. I'm going to point at it whenever someone gets another crazy idea.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 15, 2010, at 8:20 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> If you DO become iTunes, Google, or Twitter, your app won't scale. Period. I've never seen a system that scales without investing substantial engineering effort in profiling and rearchitecture after deployment
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>>>
>>>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
>
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden