Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
- Subject: Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
- From: Ken Anderson <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:43:02 -0500
I'm sure a good quant could build a suck correlation matrix and do a complete analysis... I happen to agree - the only platform I like as much as WO is Cocoa :)
On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:40 PM, Mike Schrag wrote:
> It was for dramatic literary effect ... Obviously every technology has things that are cool and things that are terrible. However, I have to say that I'm pretty disappointed that, after 13 years, there isn't a clear choice of a technology to switch to from WO. For all of its pitfalls, I think WO has a really good balance of engineering decisions, and the length of its survival is a testament to that. Given that there has really been almost no external development of WO in years, you'd think that I could name a single technology that is an obvious choice to move to that has comparable trade-offs, but I have yet to see one that excites me in the same way. The problem is that you can't just make a suck ratio, because everyone has different values for suck coefficients. You could probably make a suck linear combination, though.
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden