Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
- Subject: Re: WebObjects scalability question - WOSession?
- From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:23:46 -0800
On Nov 16, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Pascal Robert wrote:
>>
>> I think an important distinction here is between "expect people to use their systems" and "allow people to use their systems". Wonder largely falls in the second category. "I made this because I found it interesting and you can use it if you want." Neither WO nor Wonder are now marketed products and there is little incentive to make them appear like they are.
>
> Wonder was marketed in the past??
I don't recall if it was ever sold or if it was always free. Back when netstruxr (however it was spelled) was the driving force behind it, there was more focus and someone promoting it. Now it is more like an overgrown garden.
Chuck
--
Chuck Hill Senior Consultant / VP Development
Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden