Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 7, Issue 767
Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 7, Issue 767
- Subject: Re: Webobjects-dev Digest, Vol 7, Issue 767
- From: Antonio Petri <email@hidden>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:36:40 +0000
I am not that excited. WOnder might have stolen things from Rails like REST support, however, fundamental architectural concepts like MVC
and the use of an ORM for accessing a relational database where in WO before most of the other frameworks existed. ActiveRecord
and Scaffolding, to stay in the Rails field, are just a simpler and more limited versions of EOF and D2W in my opinion so, still in my opinion,
Rails is the follower in those things and it might never catch up.
As a beginner in Web Application development, I am of course evaluating more than one technology, and from what I can see, considering
the effort corporations and communities are putting in their products compared to what Apple is doing, WO should look stone age technology;
but it doesn't.
On 17 November 2010 18:10, Jean Pierre Malrieu
<email@hidden> wrote:
Le 17 nov. 2010 à 00:54, email@hidden a écrit :
> The fact that WO hasn't changed so much with time may be a sign that it got it right from the beginning.
By where is the feeling of excitement? Many ideas in Wonder are rip off from advances brought by other frameworks, using other languages (Ruby for example).
WO seems to be a follower nowadays. The fact that it can follow is a good thing, though. _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden