Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?
Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?
- Subject: Re: Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?
- From: Alan Ward <email@hidden>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:43:12 -0600
On Sep 10, 2010, at 9:18 AM, Michael DeMan wrote:
> Well
>
> I can not say for sure, but it is incredibly difficult to get folks who have expertise in WebObjects anywhere, at low cost.
Why would you want them at low cost?
> It also has been a dying technology since NeXT got Apple back.
I disagree. Stable, yes. Dying, no.
> I am not sure why it was never just open sourced, other than it must be that somebody somewhere at ex-NeXT or Apple has an unreasonable ego.
It's not about anyone's ego.
Alan
>
> Also, there is no reason for a large company that has staffing requirements, to not use technologies that have broader exposure in advance to incoming technology professionals
>
>
>
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 11:54 PM, Mertz Stéphan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The new 'the Sales and Trend reporting module' of iTunes Connect is develop with JSF instead of WebObjects.
>> Does Apple stop to use WebObjects for its internal tools?
>>
>> Does someone know what is powering the new Ping social network ?
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Stéphan _______________________________________________
>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
>> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>>
>> This email sent to email@hidden
>
> _______________________________________________
> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
> Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
>
> This email sent to email@hidden
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden