• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: This non-active rule crashes my app!
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: This non-active rule crashes my app!

  • Subject: Re: This non-active rule crashes my app!
  • From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 14:27:02 -0700
Because the rule system uses _NSUtilities.classWithName() to get the class name.  It will find a class by name, if it is uniquely named, or if you use a fully qualified class name, then it will treat it like java's standard Class.forName().  The assignment class is er.directtoweb.assignments.ERDKeyValueAssignment not er.directtoweb.ERDKeyValueAssignment.

Ramsey

On Dec 7, 2011, at 2:21 PM, James Cicenia wrote:

fqcn ?  fully qualified component name?

Well then where is it? Why would ERDKeyValueAssignment not crash my app but using the fully qualified does?

James

Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: This email sent to email@hidden
References: 
 >This non-active rule crashes my app! (From: James Cicenia <email@hidden>)
 >Re: This non-active rule crashes my app! (From: Ramsey Gurley <email@hidden>)
 >Re: This non-active rule crashes my app! (From: James Cicenia <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: Now gives me a Factory error.
  • Next by Date: Re: Weird Behaviour...
  • Previous by thread: Re: This non-active rule crashes my app!
  • Next by thread: D2W with fake propertyKey.
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread