RE: ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorPool exception
RE: ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorPool exception
- Subject: RE: ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorPool exception
- From: Michael Gargano <email@hidden>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 23:27:03 -0800
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Thread-topic: ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorPool exception
Okay, I’ve figured out how to set this up across servers, but I’m still seeing the exception. Doesn’t seem to cause any problems but I haven’t met a stack trace I like. I’m a little unsure exactly why you need to make the choice between using the remote synchronizer and using setFetchTimestamp(System.getCurrentTimeInMillis()) on EC creation. Isn’t the end effect really the same? The DB cache gets the freshest data in both cases, no? Thanks. -Mike From: webobjects-dev-bounces+mgargano=email@hidden [mailto:webobjects-dev-bounces+mgargano=email@hidden] On Behalf Of Michael Gargano
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 4:50 PM
To: WebObjects webobjects-dev
Subject: ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorPool exception I just configured the ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorPool have 4 coordinators using the ERJGroupSyncronizer. I have 2 application servers running 2 apps each. The apps on each box talk to each other and both servers share one DB. --------------------------- --------------------------- taskRunnerApp taskRunnerApp Everything seems to be running okay, but now that I've turned on the coordinator pool I see this strange exception. ERROR er.extensions.eof.ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorSynchronizer - java.lang.NullPointerException at er.extensions.eof.ERXEOAccessUtilities.databaseContextForEntityNamed(ERXEOAccessUtilities.java:1011) at er.extensions.eof.ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorSynchronizer$ProcessChangesQueue._process(ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorSynchronizer.java:490) at er.extensions.eof.ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorSynchronizer$ProcessChangesQueue.process(ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorSynchronizer.java:521) at er.extensions.eof.ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorSynchronizer$ProcessChangesQueue.run(ERXObjectStoreCoordinatorSynchronizer.java:598) ... skipped 1 stack elements Anything to be concerned about? I also set both apps to use the same group name, so I assume that means that it's syncing the EOF stacks across both apps. Is there a way to do this across servers as well, and is that even a good idea? |
_______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
This email sent to email@hidden