• Open Menu Close Menu
  • Apple
  • Shopping Bag
  • Apple
  • Mac
  • iPad
  • iPhone
  • Watch
  • TV
  • Music
  • Support
  • Search apple.com
  • Shopping Bag

Lists

Open Menu Close Menu
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Lists hosted on this site
  • Email the Postmaster
  • Tips for posting to public mailing lists
Re: Hudson and frameworks reference
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Hudson and frameworks reference


  • Subject: Re: Hudson and frameworks reference
  • From: Chuck Hill <email@hidden>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 10:54:44 -0800

On Jan 14, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Pascal Robert wrote:

> We are moving from CVS to Git, and after that we are going to use Hudson to build the projects from Git. Now, I was wondering how WO people handle frameworks dependencies when building WO applications. So far, I see two options:
>
> - Have jobs to build all the frameworks and put them in one location, and have wo.local.frameworks to point to that place.
> - Building each frameworks "locally" (eg, in the job directory of the application that is going to be build)
>
> Problem for option #1 is that we do have some applications that use different  branches of the frameworks, so by having a central location some frameworks would be override by a install made from a different branch.
>
> Option #2 is better, but since most applications have at least 5 frameworks, and we have over 40 applications, that means that some frameworks might be build 40 times... Not very efficient.

Do you always build all 40 apps at the same time?


> I guess an option would be to use a central location for stuff coming from the trunk, and that each project have a custom wobuild.properties file + a Library/Frameworks folder in the workspace of the Hudson job for the application. That "local" Library/Frameworks folder would have symlinks to the central location of frameworks coming from trunk, and if some framework is not coming from trunk, it is build with the application job.

That might be a reasonable option.


> Any opinions on that? Should I move the team to Maven just before I leave my job in one month? :-)


Do they owe you money?  :-P

I guess that Maven is an alternative.  I am still not convinced that it will be less work or fewer headaches.


Chuck

--
Chuck Hill             Senior Consultant / VP Development

Practical WebObjects - for developers who want to increase their overall knowledge of WebObjects or who are trying to solve specific problems.
http://www.global-village.net/products/practical_webobjects







Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

 _______________________________________________
Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored.
Webobjects-dev mailing list      (email@hidden)
Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to email@hidden

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: Hudson and frameworks reference
      • From: Henrique Prange <email@hidden>
References: 
 >Hudson and frameworks reference (From: Pascal Robert <email@hidden>)

  • Prev by Date: Re: non-existent target of existing key in relationship
  • Next by Date: Re: mutually exclusive 1-to-0 or 1 relationship modeling
  • Previous by thread: Re: Hudson and frameworks reference
  • Next by thread: Re: Hudson and frameworks reference
  • Index(es):
    • Date
    • Thread